Web Survey Bibliography
Title The GfK NOP Media Efficiency Panel
Year 2011
Access date 13.05.2013
Abstract
MRS Company Partner GfK NOP won the 2011 MRS Award for Advertising & Media Research for this great case study describing how research can give vital answers to those important and frequently asked questions about the relative efficiency of different media. The award was given to Babita, Karsten and Corrine because of the way that their research approach created a really valuable tool that evaluated exposures to different media and linked these to sales.
Access/Direct link
Homepage (Text)
Year of publication2011
Bibliographic typeReports, seminars
Full text availabilityFurther details
Web survey bibliography (4086)
- Use of Paradata to Manage a Field Data Collection; 2009; Groves, R. M., Axinn, W., Lepkowski, J. M., Kirgis, N., Mosher, W.
- A Systematic Approach to Debugging in the Blaise Environment: An Author's Perspective; 2009; Sparks, P.
- Paradata and Blaise: A Review of Recent Applications and Research; 2009; O’Reilly, J.
- Development of Survey and Case Management facilities for organisations with minimal survey infrastructure...; 2009; Wensing, F.
- Be mindful of cellphone interviews; 2009; Anonymous
- Growth of Mobile-Only Population in the US and its impact on optimal designs; 2009; Srinivasan, R.
- The 'Functionally Mobile-Only' The true extent of coverage problems with landline only samples; 2009; De Keulenaer, F.
- Preference for Mobile Interview Surveys? Interplay of costs, errors and biases; 2009; Vehovar, V., Slavec, A.
- Mode or Mensch?: Respondent sensitivity to mode changes in data collection methods; 2009; McCutcheon, A. L.
- Generation (of) RDD Improving call efficiency of mobile RDD samples; 2009; Husztik, P.
- Flash Eurobarometer Goes Mobile: A practical review; 2009; Hideg, G.
- Are Respondents Sharing their Mobile Phones? Preliminary results based on a mobile phone panel in Germany...; 2009; Fuchs, M.
- Mobilisation: A general overview; 2009; Manchin, R.
- NOM Print Monitor: gereed voor de toekomst!; 2009; Petric, I., Appel, M.
- Asking Factual Knowledge Questions: Reliability in Web-Based, Passive Sampling Surveys ; 2009; Elo, K.
- If You Provide It, Will They Read It? Response Time Effects in a Choice Experiment; 2009; Vista, A. B., Rosenberger, R. S., Collins, A. R.
- Pictures in Web Surveys; 2009; Toepoel, V., Couper, M. P.
- National readership surveys: Moving from probability face-to-face surveys to Internet panels; 2009; Vehovar, V., Slavec, A., Petric, I., Sargac, M.
- Why don’t all Businesses report on Web?; 2009; Haraldsen, G.
- An experiment on the effects of non-response reweighting on estimators' precision in a web survey; 2009; Fabrizi, E., Biffignandi, S., Toninelli, D.
- Dynamic feedback in open-ended questions: Experiments on the visual design language of Web surveys; 2009; Fuchs, M.
- Effects of monetary incentives on participation in a two-wave online survey; 2009; Bandilla, W., Haas, I.
- Response Order and Response Distributions: The Format of the Response Options in a Web Survey; 2009; Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G., Couper, M. P., Balter, O.
- Anticipated estimation from a panel Web survey: the case of the presence of tourists in the Province...; 2009; Scaffai, G., Pratesi, M.
- Statistical analysis of on-line courses; 2009; Baelter, O.
- Methodological approaches of Web 2.0; 2009; Neubarth, W.
- Is this e-mail relevant? An eyetracking experiment on how potential respondents read e-mail invitations...; 2009; Kaczmirek, L., Faaß, T., Galesic, M.
- File transfer with built-in editing features; 2009; Erikson, J.
- From paper to internet: Design challenges when mixing modes in longitudinal surveys; 2009; Stax, H.-P., Thomsen, P.
- The Use of Audit Trails in Business Web Surveys; 2009; Snijkers, G., Morren, M.
- Yes, VASs can! Increasing the accuracy of survey measurements with computerized visual analogue scales...; 2009; Funke, F., Reips, U.-D.
- Using Mail Contact to Sample and Encourage Submission of Questionnaire Answers Over the Internet; 2009; Dillman, D. A., Messer, B. L., Millar, M. M.
- Improving the Design of Complex Matrix Questions; 2009; Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G.
- Use of Web surveys in Official Statistics; 2009; Bethlehem, J.
- Relations between functionality and usability of Web survey software tools: An empirical evaluation; 2009; Berzelak, N., Lozar Manfreda, K.
- Turning Grid Questions into Sequences in Business Web Surveys; 2009; Haraldsen, G., Bergstrøm, Y.
- The Electronic Questionnaire Experience in Business Surveys: mode effects on quality and on response...; 2009; Biffignandi, S., Siesto, G., Zeli, A.
- Reducing Measurement Error in Web Surveys; 2009; Couper, M. P.
- Reducing Measurement Errors in Surveys; 2009; De Leeuw, E. D.
- Mode Effects and Other Potential Biases in Panel-based Internet Surveys: Final Report; 2009; Taylor, P. A., Nelson, N. M., Grandjean, B. D., Anatchkova, B., Aadland, D.
- Findings from consumer surveys on Internet Shopping: A comparison of pre and post study consumer research...; 2009; Anonymous
- Pros and Cons of Internet Surveys Compared to Traditional Survey Methods; 2009; Benjamin, G. D.
- Visual Design Effects on Respondents’ Behavior in Web-Surveys; 2009; Greinoecker, A.
- Using online panels to conduct Web-based research: What works and what doesn’t; 2009; Goeritz, A.
- Balancing the tension between internal and external validity in online intervention research; 2009; Parks-Sheiner, A.
- Ethical Issues in Internet Research ; 2009; McKee, H., Porter, J.
- Making informed technology choices for online research; 2009; Macer, T.
- Practical advice on Internet Research: From Surveys on Social Computing; 2009; Konstan, J. A.
- True Web experiments; 2009; Reips, U.-D.
- Comments on the Articles (3) - Three Key Takeaways from the Zero Bank Debate; 2009; W.Link, M. W.